View point score
2025 Senior Metropolitan Competition · Metro 2 Men
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Seacliff Hockey Club M2M | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 9 | 100% |
| 2. Prince Alfred Collegians Hockey Club | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 100% |
| 3. Adelaide Hills Hockey Club | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 56% |
| 4. Adelaide University Hockey Club M2M | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 | 50% |
| 5. Adelaide Hockey Club | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 2 | 22% |
| 6. Port Adelaide District Hockey Club | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 2 | 22% |
| 7. Forestville Hockey Club | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 | 17% |
| 8. North East Hockey Club M2M | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 | 11% |
| 9. Flinders University Hockey Club | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 | 0% |
The point score is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
point scores. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Sponsors
We Support
